Cases 71 - 80 of 429,398
MURZIKE v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
R QUINN, W GIELOW, J SANTIAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WESLEY v. PAYNE et al
as 5:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
JAMES ALLEN WESLEY, JR
Defendant:
S PAYNE and C WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUNTER v. UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE et al
as 4:2024cv00119
Petitioner:
JASON HUNTER, SR
Respondent:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, CHRISTINE PLETCHER, THEODORE JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CUMMINGS v. CRUNK et al
as 4:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
HORACE BENJAMIN CUMMINGS
Defendant:
WILLIAM CRUNK, KASEY M PAYNTER, JAMES R RYAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCWILLIAMS v. MURPHY
as 5:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
MAURICE MCWILLIAMS
Defendant:
P MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROMANICK v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
PAUL SHANE ROMANICK
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
CURRY v. USA
as 4:2024cv00197
Petitioner:
JOSHUA CURRY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
RIVAZ v. MCNEIL et al
as 5:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
JARREL DANIEL RIVAZ
Defendant:
RAYMOND MCNEIL, JOSEPH HUTCHISON and KRISTIAN SHAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TANCREDI et al v. WALTON COUNTY, FL
as 3:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Anthony Tancredi and Stephanie Tancredi
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY, FL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
