Cases 71 - 80 of 6,031
Boykins v. Scotland Correctional Institution et al
as 3:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Roderick Boykins
Defendant:
Scotland Correctional Institution, FNU Locklear, Dean Locklear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Peter Buchholtz, Brandeshawn Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL-EL v. FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF REGISTER et al
as 1:2023cv01086
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ROBERT HILL-EL
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF REGISTER and NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT PUBLIC SAFETY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crump v. Ohio Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 3:2023cv00824
Plaintiff:
Ramar Dion Benjamin Crump
Defendant:
Ohio Casualty Insurance Company, Geoffrey Anderson, Bentrell Blocker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elliott v. Young
as 5:2024ct03004
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Dianna Elliott
Defendant:
Rhonda G. Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
NORRIS v. DRISCHLER
as 1:2023cv01063
Plaintiff:
RICKY NORRIS
Defendant:
K. DRISCHLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kovatch v. Dare County Sheriff's Department
as 5:2023ct03323
Plaintiff:
Shane Kovatch
Defendant:
Dare County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELLIS v. STANTON et al
as 1:2023cv01043
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JERMAINE ELLIS
Defendant:
INA STANTON, RONNIW BEST, JONATHAN TODD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. Biden
as 5:2023ct03343
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SATTERFIELD v. MCCADDAMS et al
as 1:2023cv01071
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ANTONIO SATTERFIELD
Defendant:
HOLLIE MCCADDAMS, MERILYN P. NEWELL, JOSH STEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
