Cases 81 - 90 of 2,404
Laccinole v. MRS BPO, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00233
Plaintiff:
Christopher Laccinole
Defendant:
MRS BPO, LLC, Saul Freedman and Jeffrey Freedman
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Laccinole v. MRS BPO, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00234
Plaintiff:
Christopher Laccinole
Defendant:
MRS BPO, LLC, Saul Freedman and Jeffrey Freedman
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Laccinole v. Gulf Coast Collection Bureau et al
as 1:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Christopher Laccinole
Defendant:
Gulf Coast Collection Bureau, Jack Warren Brown, III and Marie S. Areskog
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
MMJ Internal Holdings Corp. et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv00152
Petitioner:
MMJ International Holdings Corp., MMJ Biopharma Cultivation, Inc. and MMJ Biopharma Labs, Inc.
Respondent:
Merrick B Garland, Ann Milgram, Thomas Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Velasquez v. U.S. Superior Court
as 1:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
Diego Velasquez
Defendant:
U.S. Superior Court
Intervenor:
Jimmy Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rosario et al v. Moe's Place, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00121
Plaintiff:
Carissa Rosario, Jessica Killings and Lucy Pinder
Defendant:
Moe's Place, Inc. and Marc Dure
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Sampedro et al v. Ibiza Lounge, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
Claudia Sampedro, Iesha Marie Crespo, Jessica Hinton and others
Defendant:
Ibiza Lounge, LLC and Jonathan A. Garcia
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Bento Enterprises, LLC et al v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
Bento Enterprises, LLC and Elizabeth Martins Bento
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Velasquez v. Marte
as 1:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Diego Velasquez
Defendant:
Carlos Marte
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Sachs v. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority
as 1:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
Betsy Sachs
Defendant:
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
