Cases 81 - 90 of 287
AMERICAN ADDICTION CENTERS, INC. et al v. GREENAGEL II et al
as 3:2018cv17428
Defendant:
GREENAGEL COUNSELING SERVICES, LLC, ANDREW WALSH and FRANK L. GREENAGEL II
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN ADDICTION CENTERS, INC. and RECOVERY BRANDS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
IACONE v. JANOFF et al
as 2:2019cv13516
Defendant:
CRYSTAL PLAZA CATERERS, CRYSTAL PLAZA GROUP, ALLAN JANOFF and others
Plaintiff:
ALEC IACONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCIORE et al v. PHUNG et al
as 1:2019cv13775
Plaintiff:
OLD CITY PRETZEL COMPANY, LLC and MICHAEL SCIORE
Defendant:
STUDIO KP LLC, KELLY PHUNG and JOHN DOES #1-8
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCLEOD v. RODRIGUEZ
as 3:2019cv12360
Defendant:
JULISSA MARIA RODRIGUEZ
Petitioner:
STEVE MCCLEOD
Plaintiff:
STEVE MCLEOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SANOH v. TARGET CORPORATION
as 2:2019cv12063
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION, JOHN DOE and ABC-XYZ CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
MAHMOUD SANOH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
AHN v. CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2019cv07141
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY M AHN, M.D.
Defendant:
CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, JANES DOES 1-10 and ABC CORPORATIONS 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
YANG v. PEONY LIN et al
as 2:2019cv08534
Plaintiff:
TZUHSIN YANG and CHRISTINE YANG
Defendant:
JANE DOE and PEONY LIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KORCHAK v. JOHN DOE et al
as 3:2018cv17575
Defendant:
JANE DOES 1-30 and JOHN DOE
Plaintiff:
SHIRLY KORCHAK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CADAVID CORREA v. CAESARS ATLANTIC CITY et al
as 1:2018cv15994
Defendant:
ABC CORP. NOS. 1-10, PAT DIGIACOMO, JR., CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID M. CADAVID CORREA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCGILLVARY v. HOLOM et al
as 2:2018cv17487
Defendant:
JOHN DOES, JOHN DOE, JESSICA HOLOM and others
Plaintiff:
CALEB L MCGILLVARY and KAI THE HATCHET WIELDING HITCHHIKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
