Cases 81 - 90 of 109
Richard Dunsmore v. Marsha McLane
as 18-11175
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD A. DUNSMORE, Individually, And as a Resident of the TEXAS CIVIL COMMITMENT CENTER, et al
Defendant - Appellee:
MARSHA MCLANE, TCCO Executive Director
Williams v. Luera et al
as 5:2018cv00168
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Williams
Defendant:
Kristina Luera and Mandi Castillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Caswell et al
as 5:2018cv00181
Defendant:
Mr. Peter Caswell, Mr. Michael Searcy, Ms. Kara B Gougler and others
Plaintiff:
Delbert Glenn Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lonnie Welsh v. Correct Care Recovery, et al
as 18-10942
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE KADE WELSH
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECT CARE RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, CHRIS WOODS, Individually as Director of Security, Texas Civil Commitment Center for C.C.R.S., AMY GOLDSTEIN, Individually as Director of Security, Texas Civil Commitment Center for C.C.R.S. and others
Howard v. Busby et al
as 5:2018cv00162
Defendant:
Tim Buds, Judge Steve Busby, Ray Perez and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Joe Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garms v. Comanche County
as 4:2018cv00555
Plaintiff:
Jason Berna Garms
Defendant:
Comanche County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terrence Brown v. R. Myers, et al
as 18-50414
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRENCE M. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN R. MYERS, ASSISTANT WARDEN FNU CARTER, FNU WOHLD and others
May v. Chief Executive Off Gregg Abbott
as 5:2018cv00114
Plaintiff:
Alonzo May
Defendant:
Chief Executive Off Gregg Abbott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WASHINGTON D.C.
as 4:2018cv01188
Plaintiff:
Rafael Robertson
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WASHINGTON D.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Welsh v. Correct Care Recovery Solutions et al
as 5:2018cv00020
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant:
Correct Care Recovery Solutions, Bryan Thomas, Chris Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
