Cases 81 - 90 of 2,444
Goines v. Nicholson et al
as 1:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Frank Goines, II
Defendant:
Thunder Nicholson, John Wyatt and Jeremy Farling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Folse v. McCuskey et al
as 2:2023cv00561
Plaintiff:
Jay Folse
Defendant:
John McCuskey, Jr. and G. Russell Rollyson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00623
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Whaling v. State of WV
as 2:2023cv00568
Plaintiff:
Andrew Cole Whaling
Defendant:
Jim Justice, State of West Virginia, Patrick Morrisey and others
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777 Civil Shell Case Opening
Raabe v. Harvey et al
as 2:2023cv00580
Plaintiff:
Nancy A. Raabe
Defendant:
Officer Harvey and John/Jane Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bigley v. Morgantown Sheriff Dept et al
as 1:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Bigley
Defendant:
Morgantown Sheriff Dept, Sheriff Department, Morgantown WV and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Folse v. Frazier
as 2:2023cv00555
Plaintiff:
Jay Folse
Defendant:
Everett Frazier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lacy v. Taylor et al
as 2:2023cv00621
Plaintiff:
Albert William Lacy
Defendant:
Mark E. Taylor, Tammie Roberts, Clark D. Adkins and others
Interested Party:
Monique Lacy
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
