Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 81 - 90 of 30,354
SPRAUVE v. UNKNOWN OFFICIAL AT DURHAM COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2024cv00320
Plaintiff: JON C. SPRAUVE
Defendant: UNKNOWN OFFICIAL AT DURHAM COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and UNKNOWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Clark et al
as 5:2024ct03043
Plaintiff: John Frank Miller
Defendant: Ms. Clark, Ms. Lee, Cpt. Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHAMBERS v. SHU STAFF AT UNITED STATES PENITENTARY
as 1:2024cv00309
Petitioner: MARCUS DONTRIEL CHAMBERS
Respondent: SHU STAFF AT UNITED STATES PENITENTARY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
v. Rangel Gonzales et al
as 5:2024hc02079
Defendant: Gloria Rangel Gonzales
Respondent: Sheriff Willie Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rangel Gonzales v. Rowe
as 5:2024hc02080
Petitioner: Gloria Rangel Gonzales
Respondent: Sheriff Willie Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holland v. Ishee
as 1:2024cv00107
Petitioner: Markas L. Holland
Respondent: Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oladokun v. Kelly
as 5:2024ct03091
Plaintiff: Oladayo Oladokun
Defendant: Warden L.B. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Boyd v. USA
as 3:2024cv00383
Petitioner: Patrick Jerome Boyd
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Rosado v. Langdon et al
as 1:2024cv00108
Plaintiff: Luis Antonio Rosado, Jr.
Defendant: FNU Langdon, Cindy Hayes, Kevin Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arriaga v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00384
Petitioner: Angel Arriaga
Respondent: USA
Interested Party: USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?