Cases 81 - 90 of 10,599
Eastwood v. Mingo County Commission et al
as 2:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jackson Eastwood, Jr.
Defendant:
Mingo County Commission, Mingo County Sheriff Joe Smith, Deputy J. D. Tincher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Damron v. F.C.I Hazelton's Warden
as 3:2024cv00016
Petitioner:
Jon Damron
Respondent:
F.C.I Hazelton's Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fletcher v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 3:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Fletcher
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Warden R. Brown, c/o Captain D. Boyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Michael v. Givens et al
as 2:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Robert Logan Michael
Defendant:
Pamela Givens, Sandra May, Shirley Hamrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crockett v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Timmy A. Crockett
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kiser v. Tincher et al
as 2:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Etta Kiser
Defendant:
Dep. Josh D. Tincher, Dep. Erwin Williams and Mingo County Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Park v. USA
as 5:2024cv00027
Petitioner:
Christopher L. Park
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Ford v. Lovette
as 5:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
Dallas Ford
Respondent:
Warden Lovette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Midkiff v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
Scott Lee Midkiff
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Leon v. Lovett
as 5:2024cv00022
Petitioner:
Nestor Leon
Respondent:
Warden Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
