Cases filed in Alabama
Cases 41 - 50 of 90,145
Boone v. Mack
as 1:2024cv00067
Petitioner: George Boone, Jr.
Respondent: State Of Alabama and Huey Hoss Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gray v. Weiser Security Services, Inc. (CONSENT)
as 2:2024cv00150
Plaintiff: Morgan Gray
Defendant: Weiser Security Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1875 Jury System Improvement Act (Juror Employment Protection)
Type: Labor Labor: Other
First Horizon Bank v. HomeTown Lenders Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00530
Plaintiff: First Horizon Bank
Defendant: HomeTown Lenders Inc and William E Taylor, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00539
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Battle v. Alabama, State of
as 2:2024cv00540
Petitioner: Antonio Dentray Battle
Respondent: Alabama, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson et al v. SV Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00262
Plaintiff: Joseph Robinson and Jonathan Robinson
Defendant: SV Group, Inc. and Renardo Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00261
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00260
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Howard v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00258
Plaintiff: Pamela Howard
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
English v. Wolpert et al
as 1:2024cv00137
Plaintiff: Leonard English, Jr.
Defendant: Christopher M. Wolpert, David Tighe, Jerome A. Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?