Cases 41 - 50 of 429,371
WESLEY v. PAYNE et al
as 5:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
JAMES ALLEN WESLEY, JR
Defendant:
S PAYNE and C WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
RIVAZ v. MCNEIL et al
as 5:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
JARREL DANIEL RIVAZ
Defendant:
RAYMOND MCNEIL, JOSEPH HUTCHISON and KRISTIAN SHAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CUMMINGS v. CRUNK et al
as 4:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
HORACE BENJAMIN CUMMINGS
Defendant:
WILLIAM CRUNK, KASEY M PAYNTER, JAMES R RYAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCWILLIAMS v. MURPHY
as 5:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
MAURICE MCWILLIAMS
Defendant:
P MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROMANICK v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
PAUL SHANE ROMANICK
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
FARNEY v. GEO GROUP
as 3:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
ADAM C FARNEY
Defendant:
GEO GROUP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOODSON v. LOVE MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC
as 4:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Mickey Goodson
Defendant:
Love Management Company, LLC d/b/a Allegro Senior Living and LOVE MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC doing business as ALLEGRO SENIOR LIVING LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
BERKLEY SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. LIBERTY CHURCH, INC. et al
as 3:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
BERKLEY SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
LIBERTY CHURCH, INC., PAR CHURCH BUILDERS, INC. and JOES ROOFING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
