Cases 51 - 60 of 21,655
Lora v. Swaney
as 2:2024cv00061
Petitioner:
Jose Lora
Respondent:
Warden G. Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kinsey v. White Star Supply, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Tracey Kinsey
Defendant:
White Star Supply, LLC and Bradford L. Shanks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ketner v. Western Power Sports, Inc
as 4:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
John Ketner
Defendant:
Western Power Sports, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Oxford v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00031
Petitioner:
Carmen Michelle Oxford
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ott-Lord v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Sally V. Ott-Lord
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration and United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Clay v. O' Malley
as 4:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Eric D. Clay
Defendant:
Martin O' Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration and United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Ussery v. Law Office of Public Defender et al
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Roger Ussery
Defendant:
Law Office of Public Defender and Kelly Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
