Cases 11 - 20 of 11,316
Brown v. Grant County Prosecutor Agency et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Petitioner:
Lloyd Brown and Lloyd Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
Service List
Respondent:
Grant County Prosecutor Agency, Grant County Probation Agency, Marion, Indiana City of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moorman v. Jones et al
as 3:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Kir Moorman
Defendant:
Jones and Garcia
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00380
Petitioner:
James Michael Brown
Respondent:
Division Of Indiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stanton v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00382
Petitioner:
Daniel Stanton, Jr
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. South Bend Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00381
Plaintiff:
Derek Lee Jones
Defendant:
South Bend Police Department and St Joseph County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sims v. Wheeler et al
as 3:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
John Sims
Defendant:
Wheeler, Monerpenny, Raglin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walton Sr. v. Porter County Jail
as 2:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Bobby E. Walton Sr.
Defendant:
Porter County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walton Sr. v. Porter County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Bobby E. Walton Sr.
Defendant:
Porter County Jail and Quality Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanchard v. Hegg et al
as 3:2024cv00379
Plaintiff:
Lavara Blanchard
Defendant:
Ron Hegg and A Hahn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walton Jr. v. Porter County Jail
as 2:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Bobby Walton Jr.
Defendant:
Porter County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
