Cases 61 - 70 of 6,352
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title 9 of the Education Amendment Act of 1972
State of Missouri et al v. The City of St. Louis et al
as 4:2024cv00333
Plaintiff:
Mat Food STL LLC A Missouri Corporation doing business as McLaran Market, Mahmoud Motan, State of Missouri and others
Defendant:
City of Saint Louis, Missouri, Mona Parsley, George Hitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. City of St. Louis et al
as 4:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Junior Robinson
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Jennifer Clemons-Abdullah, Correctional Officer John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keys v. State of Missouri
as 4:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Sidney Keys, Sr.
Defendant:
State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
