Cases 31 - 40 of 5,686
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv03112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Barnes et al v. Payne et al
as 4:2024mc09003
Plaintiff:
Nathan Barnes, Susannah Kilpatrick and Darren Kilpatrick
Defendant:
Lawrence Payne and Patricia Payne
Interested Party:
American Express
Monaco et al v. Orec America, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Shelby M Monaco and Brian Monaco
Defendant:
Orec America, Inc. and Five Star Traders, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brazell v. Lindsey et al
as 6:2024cv03110
Plaintiff:
Jason Brazell
Defendant:
Scott Lindsey, Texas County Memorial Hospital, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Shunstrom v. Cordonnier et al
as 6:2024cv03109
Plaintiff:
Alison Y. Shunstrom
Defendant:
Michael J. Cordonnier and Andrew Bailey
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Cheatom v. Rockwell Security, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Davionne Cheatom
Defendant:
Rockwell Security, LLC, Cydni (LNU) and Ulta Salon Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00147
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
