Cases 41 - 50 of 12,052
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Blankenship v. Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners et al
as 4:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Shane Blankenship
Defendant:
Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners, E. Williams and A Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Vaughan v. Dunklin
as 2:2024cv04065
Plaintiff:
Cody R. Vaughan
Defendant:
Pat Dunklin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Vaughan et al v. Stumpe
as 2:2024cv04066
Plaintiff:
Cody R. Vaughan and Jessica L. Vaughan
Defendant:
Brian K. Stumpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00598
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Elburki v. Kansas City, Missouri, Board of Police Commissioners et al
as 4:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Mr. Kamel M. Elburki, Kamel M. Elburki and Kamel M Elbarki
Defendant:
Kansas City, Missouri, Board of Police Commissioners, David Kenner, Mathew Vaccaro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
