Cases 11 - 20 of 10,425
Goodwin v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Joe Lewis Goodwin
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and USP Leavenworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mael v Kansas City Missouri Police Department et al
as 4:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Gordon Mael
Defendant:
Kansas City Missouri Police Department, Robert A Martin, Chatham D Reeve and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moody v. Falkenrath et al
as 2:2024cv04057
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Moody
Defendant:
Doris Falkenrath, Billy Dunbar, Almalee Dittman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirk v. Strid
as 6:2024cv03057
Petitioner:
Andre R Kirk
Respondent:
Myles Strid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fisher v. Javois
as 2:2024cv04063
Petitioner:
George W Fisher
Respondent:
Laurent Javois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beil v. Fischer et al
as 4:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
James Beil
Defendant:
Jo Leigh Fischer and Lynn M Stoppy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wry v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv04060
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wry
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections and Monica Arcc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGuire v. Cheney et al
as 3:2024cv05027
Plaintiff:
Tommas McGuire
Defendant:
Maleia Cheney and McDonald County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Busby v. Falkenrath et al
as 2:2024cv04028
Plaintiff:
Dennis L Busby
Defendant:
Doris Falkenrath, Andrea Galbreath and Ike
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newman v. Thompson
as 4:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Newman
Defendant:
Liz Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
