Cases 41 - 50 of 95,410
Happen Technologies, LLC v. Social Business Experience, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00643
Plaintiff:
Happen Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Social Business Experience, Inc. and Michael Francis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Smith v. Aldi, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00641
Plaintiff:
Dolores Smith
Defendant:
Aldi, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00640
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
United Steel, Paper and Forestry. Rubber, Manufacturing, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union v. Magnitude 7 Metals, LLC.
as 4:2024cv00642
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry. Rubber, Manufacturing, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union
Defendant:
Magnitude 7 Metals, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Franklin v. Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois
as 6:2024cv03139
Plaintiff:
Angela Franklin
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Kepner v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv06035
Plaintiff:
Angela Rene Kepner
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Dickens v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv04034
Plaintiff:
Cassey D. Dickens and Cassey Dwayne Dickens
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Carroll v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv05018
Plaintiff:
Candace Carroll
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
