Cases 1 - 10 of 10,843
Heavener v. Harding
as 6:2024cv00105
Petitioner:
John E Heavener and John E. Heavener
Defendant:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sechrist v. Harding
as 5:2024cv00503
Petitioner:
Tye A Sechrist
Respondent:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williamson v. Garfield County Detention Facility et al
as 5:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
Justice Walter Williamson
Defendant:
Garfield County Detention Facility, Amanda Lilly and Enid County Police Station
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickens v. Harding
as 4:2024cv00235
Petitioner:
Darrin Lynn Pickens
Respondent:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jones v. Day et al
as 6:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Paul Allen Jones
Defendant:
Jeremy Day and Trisha Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stripling v. Regalado et al
as 4:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Michael Stripling
Defendant:
Vic Regalado, Chaplin Bell and Smiley Elmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Miller
as 4:2024cv00125
Petitioner:
Shannon Latarion Scott
Respondent:
Michael Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. Holder et al
as 4:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Jermaine T Washington
Defendant:
Barret Holder and Ludi Leitch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nolan v. Davis et al
as 5:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Edford Ray Nolan, Jr
Defendant:
Bradley Davis and Enid Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mink v. Bridges et al
as 5:2024cv00484
Petitioner:
Damon Lee Mink
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
