Cases 41 - 50 of 6,283
Gray v. Strattman et al
as 3:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Gray
Defendant:
Kayla Strattman, Fast Access Healthcare and Campbell County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnpier v. Prince et al
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Gordon Johnpier
Defendant:
Ronnie Prince, Austin Swing and Dr. Kenneth Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Key et al
as 2:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Bryan Keith Hall
Defendant:
John Key and Wesley Holt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Hamilton County Jail and Detention Center et al
as 1:2024cv00084
Petitioner:
King Allah James
Respondent:
Hamilton County Jail and Detention Center and Austin Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
King v. USA
as 1:2024cv00117
Petitioner:
Garrian King
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hulse v. USA
as 2:2024cv00038
Petitioner:
Joseph Hulse
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Carrier v. Rymer et al
as 2:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Brandon Carrier
Defendant:
Jim Rymer and Matt Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Lincoln County Jail
as 4:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Justin Bradley Martin
Defendant:
Lincoln County Jail, Lincoln County Jail Administration, Lincoln County Jail Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. Phillips
as 4:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
Emmanuel Bibb Houston
Respondent:
Shawn Phillips and Herbert Slatery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hempstead v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Harold Hempstead
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Frank Strada, David Dobson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
