Cases 21 - 30 of 5,866
Moore et al v. StonePeak Ceramics, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
John Moore and Jessie Woolverton
Defendant:
StonePeak Ceramics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Barnett et al v. Adman Electric, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Jacob Barnett, Lance Bolton, Benjamin Davis and others
Defendant:
Adman Electric, Inc.
Ferriss v. HomeServe USA Corp.
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Kristie Ferriss
Defendant:
HomeServe USA Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Powell v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Powell
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Manning v. University Health System, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00164
Defendant:
University Health System, Inc. and The University of Tennessee Medical Center
Plaintiff:
Greg Manning
Carlyle v. Stryker Employment Company, LLC
as 2:2024cv02226
Plaintiff:
John Carlyle
Defendant:
Stryker Employment Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Nelson et al v. Tranco Logistics, LLC
as 1:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Thomas Nelson and Jaimie Nelson
Defendant:
Tranco Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Dougharty v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. of America
as 3:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Randy Dougharty
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Peacock et al v. Techno Coatings, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Larry Peacock, Mike Wilson and Tennessee Valley Painters' Health Fund
Defendant:
Techno Coatings, Inc. and Allen Michael Pott
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Taylor v. DHL Supply Chain, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02223
Plaintiff:
Tania Taylor
Defendant:
DHL Supply Chain, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 a Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
