Cases 141 - 150 of 6,297
Flemming v. Brun
as 3:2023cv00356
Petitioner:
Nathan G. Flemming
Respondent:
Chris Brun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bryson v. Knox County TN et al
as 3:2023cv00422
Plaintiff:
Danielle E Bryson
Defendant:
Knox County TN, Robert Cooter, LT B Keck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Garrett et al
as 1:2023cv00238
Plaintiff:
Marshall George Wilson
Defendant:
Austin Garrett, Silverdale Detention Center, Medical Silverdale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Lawson et al
as 2:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
Matthew Rogers
Defendant:
Ronnie Lawson, Butch Gallion, Hawkins County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryans v. USA
as 3:2023cv00408
Petitioner:
Mark Christopher Ryans
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hammonds v. Hill et al
as 2:2023cv00140
Plaintiff:
Wayne D. Hammonds and Wayland D. Hammonds
Defendant:
Thomas Hill, Mike Frayly, Wash Co. Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oboh v. USA
as 2:2023cv00151
Petitioner:
Osazee Nathaniel Oboh
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gifford v. Phillip et al
as 3:2023cv00347
Plaintiff:
Adam Clayton Gifford
Defendant:
Weldy Phillip, Derek Daugherty, Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stemeye v. USA
as 3:2023cv00360
Petitioner:
Kelly Jones Stemeye
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jones v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2023cv00329
Petitioner:
Chris M. Jones
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
