Cases 11 - 20 of 7,743
Moore et al v. Knox County et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Rex Allen Moore and Deanna Moore
Defendant:
Knox County, Knox County Schools Administration, Jon Rysewy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reguli et al v. Hetzel et al
as 3:2024cv00541
Plaintiff:
Connie Reguli and Wendy Hancock
Defendant:
Tracy Hetzel, Estate of Kimberly Helper, Mary Katherine Evins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00543
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ledford v. Hensley et al
as 2:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Randall Eugene Ledford
Defendant:
Mike Hensley, Walmart Unicoi, Aaron Embler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Brooks v. Wilson et al
as 1:2024cv01098
Plaintiff:
David Bryan Brooks
Defendant:
Brad Wilson, Donna Hetherington, Jody Pickens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Doe #1 (JRC) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00540
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (JRC), John Doe #2 (TJC), John Doe #3 (RKF) and others
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #039 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
John Doe #039
Defendant:
William Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Watts
as 2:2024cv02278
Plaintiff:
Roger Watts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Watts v. Juvenile Defender's Office et al
as 2:2024cv02280
Plaintiff:
Roger Watts
Defendant:
Juvenile Defender's Office, Mayor Lee Harris and Shelby County Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Dowlen v. The City of Springfield, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
Kierra Lachelle Dowlen
Defendant:
The City of Springfield, Tennessee and John Does 1-7
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
