Cases 41 - 50 of 17,562
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Bosan v. University Place Senior Living SE LP et al
as 2:2024cv02140
Plaintiff:
Rick Bosan
Defendant:
University Place Senior Living SE LP, Memphis Housing Authority, Department of Housing and Urban Development and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Shaw v. Dental Practice of Cordova et al
as 2:2024cv02268
Plaintiff:
Tekeva Shaw
Defendant:
Dental Practice of Cordova, Mid-South Oral Surgery, Christ Community Broad Dental and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaw v. Dermatology Realm et al
as 2:2024cv02271
Plaintiff:
Tekeva Shaw
Defendant:
Dermatology Realm, Clarx Big Country Dermatology, Memphis Dermatology and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
