Cases 61 - 70 of 5,392
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Woods v. Cadle et al
as 3:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Anthony Woods
Defendant:
Lindsey Cadle, Apryl Bradshaw, Tonia McFarland Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #034 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
John Joe #034 and John Doe #034
Defendant:
William - Lee, David B. Rausch and William Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Tischer v. Decherd City Police Department et al
as 4:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Tristan Tischer
Defendant:
Decherd City Police Department, Michael P Sparr, II and Patrick K Chambers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Larue et al v. UCOR LLC
as 3:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Nathan L. Larue, Laura Williams, J.D. Livingston and others
Defendant:
UCOR LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Moore v. Elizabethton Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Korane Moore
Defendant:
Elizabethton Police Department and 1st Judicial District Drug Task Force
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
