Cases 61 - 70 of 6,140
Harris v. City of Seattle et al
as 2:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Christopher Harris
Defendant:
City of Seattle, City of Tukwila, Lisa Combs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ritenburgh v. Clark County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv05185
Plaintiff:
Sandra Ritenburgh
Defendant:
Clark County Jail, Clark County Sheriff's Office, Clark County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Lanum et al
as 3:2024cv05034
Plaintiff:
Ryan Scott Adams
Defendant:
Bruce Lanum, Adam Clarino, Tony Donnington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bateman v. Hawk et al
as 2:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bateman
Defendant:
Jason Hawk, Robert Melvin, City of Newcastle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willoughby v. Sherwood et al
as 2:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Thomas Willoughby
Defendant:
Kyle Sherwood, Seatac Federal Detention Center and Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Cole et al
as 4:2024cv05003
Plaintiff:
Robert E Dixon
Defendant:
Amanda Cole, A Hogar, C Kairos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muldrow v. City of Richland
as 4:2024cv05012
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Muldrow, Jr
Defendant:
City of Richland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stites v. Strange et al
as 3:2024cv05027
Plaintiff:
Jeremie David Stites
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange and Joyce Lingle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kane v. Haynes et al
as 2:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Ali Kane and Abdoulaye Toumbou
Defendant:
Ronald Haynes, William Stockwell and Chlarson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hart v. Jackson et al
as 4:2024cv05006
Plaintiff:
Jason Mark Hart
Defendant:
Rob Jackson, Robin Smith, Lamin Sennah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
