Cases 51 - 60 of 16,725
Bobbitt v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 4:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mason Bobbitt
Defendant:
US Marshals, USA and PCRDF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Martin v. USA
as 4:2024cv00286
Petitioner:
Brandon Charles Martin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Titus v. Mortal Kombat et al
as 4:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
Mortal Kombat, Mortal Kombat III Finish Him, Ogaras Imported Cars and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Al-Barr v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Lord Judah Al-Barr
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Elmore v. Robinson et al
as 4:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
Jane Robinson, Lindsy Hill, Francis Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ribardi v. Does
as 2:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Jared Ribardi
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. WellPath Medical Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Defendant:
WellPath Medical Corporation, Kent, Rory Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toth v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Timothy Allen Toth
Defendant:
Joe Payne and Bolden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Millsaps v. Jackson et al
as 2:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Kane Derrick Millsaps
Defendant:
Moses Jackson and Michael Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sparks v. Cross County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Leonard Ellis Sparks
Defendant:
Cross County Jail, Arleen Clements and Does Cam, C. O., Cross County Jail; and Matt, C. O. Cross County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
