Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Arkansas
Cases 71 - 80 of 22,116
Lamar v. Seamster et al
as 4:2024cv00194
Plaintiff: Anthony D Lamar
Defendant: Lonnell Oquin Seamster, Sr, Laconya Harris and Aundrea Culclager
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. Roberts et al
as 1:2024cv01012
Plaintiff: Hakeem Marquizs Henry
Defendant: Sheriff Ricky Roberts, Nurse Casey Sanford and Dr. Deanna Hopson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00345
Plaintiff: Keithen L Jones
Defendant: Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neice v. City of Van Buren, Arkansas We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv02027
Plaintiff: Richard William Neice
Defendant: City of Van Buren, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dansby v. State of Arkansas
as 4:2024cv04032
Petitioner: Joseph Alexander Dansby, Sr
Respondent: State of Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lackie v. Dennis et al
as 4:2024cv00348
Plaintiff: Richard Daniel Lackie
Defendant: Dennis, John Putman and Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watts v. Hess et al
as 3:2024cv00065
Plaintiff: Jerod Watts
Defendant: Jessica Hess, Shane Russell, Tyler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cherry v. Higgins et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00172
Plaintiff: Charles Cherry
Defendant: Eric Higgins, Holmes, Fry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayfield v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00206
Plaintiff: William Mayfield
Defendant: Doe and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sherman v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00343
Plaintiff: Patrick L Sherman
Defendant: Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?