Cases 41 - 50 of 839
Morgan v. Phillips et al
as 4:2023cv04063
Plaintiff:
Dr. Nina M. Morgan
Defendant:
Dana Phillips, Chief Deputy Cody Hensley, Sergeant Kristopher Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 Petition for Removal - Civil Rights
Johnson v. Witcher, et al
as 2:2023cv02084
Plaintiff:
Denise J. Johnson
Defendant:
Mark Witcher and Dollar General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Maskell v. Green et al
as 1:2023cv01064
Plaintiff:
Adam Maskell
Defendant:
Deputy Andy Green, Deputy J. Ramirez, Deputy Anthony Gallegos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Maskell v. Nichols
as 2:2023cv02083
Plaintiff:
Adam Maskell
Defendant:
Sheriff Tim Nichols
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Maskell v. Watkins
as 1:2023cv01050
Plaintiff:
Adam Maskell
Defendant:
Julie Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Maskell v. Spain
as 1:2023cv01049
Plaintiff:
Adam Maskell
Defendant:
Frank Spain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Fayetteville Public Library et al v. Crawford County, Arkansas et al
as 5:2023cv05086
Plaintiff:
Fayetteville Public Library, Eureka Springs Carnegie Public Library, Central Arkansas Library System and others
Defendant:
Crawford County, Arkansas, Chris Keith, Todd Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Virden et al v. Crawford County, Arkansas et al
as 2:2023cv02071
Plaintiff:
Rebecka Virden, Samantha Rowlett and Nina Prater
Defendant:
Crawford County, Arkansas, County Judge Chris Keith, Quorum Court Member Robert Kevin Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maskell v. Hildreth
as 1:2023cv01048
Plaintiff:
Adam Maskell
Defendant:
Chief of Police Shaun Hildreth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Maskell v. Harrod
as 1:2023cv01047
Plaintiff:
Adam Maskell
Defendant:
Prosecuting Attorney David Harrod
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
