Cases 71 - 80 of 13,546
Hughes v. Richards et al
as 5:2024cv05069
Plaintiff:
Brian Ramon Hughes
Defendant:
Sergeant Marilyn Richards, Corporal Haynes, Corporal Caffey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poindexter v. Sanders
as 4:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Eddie Poindexter
Defendant:
Sarah Huckabee Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamar v. Dycus et al
as 6:2024cv06033
Plaintiff:
Anthony D Lamar
Defendant:
Donna Dycus, Jared Byers, Herbert Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Carter et al
as 3:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Bobby Cleveland Bennett
Defendant:
BJ Carter, Regina Hindman, Tabitha Simons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamar v. Dycus et al
as 4:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Anthony D Lamar
Defendant:
Donna Dycus, Jared Byers, Herbert Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Landerth et al
as 4:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Kendrick A Robinson
Defendant:
G Landerth, P Vanlandingham, Lakita Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clowers v. Gilliam et al
as 4:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Cameron David Clowers
Defendant:
Wade Gilliam, Saline County Detention Center and Taylor Beckwith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Koontz v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Morris B Koontz
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William Straughn, Moses Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Doe
as 6:2024cv06032
Plaintiff:
Joshua Terrell Bell
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clowers v. Gilliam et al
as 5:2024cv05067
Plaintiff:
Cameron David Clowers
Defendant:
Captain Wade Gilliam, Taylor Beckwith and Saline County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
