Cases 31 - 40 of 22,109
Pratt v. Barker et al
as 1:2024cv01028
Plaintiff:
Barry Michael Pratt, Jr.
Defendant:
District Judge Jack Barker, Chief Deputy Charlie Phillips and Sheriff Ricky Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buchanan v. Roberts et al
as 3:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Christopher Buchanan
Defendant:
Roberts, Bata, Thomas Hurst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clemons v. McSlone (#118) et al
as 6:2024cv06061
Plaintiff:
Ovell Daniel Clemons, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer McSlone (#118), Officer Ramirez (#171), Officer Gibson (#105) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Goodman
as 6:2024cv06059
Plaintiff:
Keithes Montel Jones
Defendant:
Nurse Goodman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chenault v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
James C Chenault
Defendant:
S Williams and Pritcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilder v. Cestui Que Trust
as 4:2024cv00367
Plaintiff:
Craig Bernard Wilder
Defendant:
Cestui Que Trust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stockton v. Reed et al
as 4:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Joshua Stockton
Defendant:
Marshal Reed, Aundrea Culclager, Joe Page, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Turnkey Health
as 4:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Miller
Defendant:
Turnkey Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maget v. Richard et al
as 4:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Abbagayle Marie Maget and Kevin Lee Maget
Defendant:
Richard, Brush-Strode, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennedy v. White County, Arkansas et al
as 4:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Kennedy
Defendant:
White County, Arkansas, Phillip Miller, Clayton Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
