Cases 1 - 10 of 120,283
(PC) DePonte v. Bowman, et al.
as 2:2024cv01262
Plaintiff:
David Arthur DePonte
Defendant:
Jessica Bowman and Daniel Queava
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Nible v. Macomber et al
as 2:2024cv01259
Plaintiff:
William Lyle Nible
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber and Tommee Dorsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Scroggins v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Scroggins
Defendant:
Steve Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Freeman v. Dudley et al
as 2:2024cv01258
Plaintiff:
Kyle Freeman
Defendant:
Dudley, R. Singh, E. Tardd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Medical Staff from Program 1 et al
as 4:2024cv02579
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon V. Hill
Defendant:
Medical Staff from Program 1, Monique and Jenny Clay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Wilhelm v. Mule Creek State Prison
as 2:2024cv01226
Petitioner:
Steve Wilhelm
Respondent:
Mule Creek State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Iseli v. Lynch
as 2:2024cv01220
Petitioner:
Branden Willie Iseli
Respondent:
Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Gonsalves v. Superior Court Antelope Valley et al
as 1:2024cv00516
Petitioner:
Anthony David Gonsalves, Jr.
Respondent:
Superior Court Antelope Valley and CDCR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Mack v. Schwarzneggar et al
as 2:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Mack
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzneggar, Edmund G. Brown, Gavin Newsom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Thomas v. Gomez et al
as 1:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas
Defendant:
Gomez and Lindquist
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
