Cases 91 - 100 of 17,541
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
John Doe (KWS) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
John Doe (KWS)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cruz v. Colby et al
as 1:2024cv02210
Plaintiff:
Jamie Cruz and Jorge Cruz
Defendant:
Colby Burmeister, West Tennessee Judicial Violent Crime and Drug Task Force for the Twenty-Eighth Judicial District, Haywood County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fontana, Sr. v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Jimmy L. Fontana, Sr.
Defendant:
William Lee and David B Rousch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Cruz v. Colby et al
as 2:2024cv02210
Plaintiff:
Jamie Cruz
Defendant:
Jorge Cruz, Brumeister Colby, West Tennessee Violent Crime and Drug Task Force for the Twenty-Eighth Judicial District and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Doe #055 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
John Doe #055
Defendant:
William Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
