Cases 71 - 80 of 7,255
Hudson v. Bonner
as 2:2024cv02072
Petitioner:
Melvin Hudson
Respondent:
Floyd Bonner, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Onyiego v. Wardlow
as 2:2024cv02073
Petitioner:
Justus Onyiego
Respondent:
Jerry Wardlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Wardlow et al
as 1:2024cv01028
Plaintiff:
Curtis Taylor
Defendant:
Jerry Wardlow, Purtle, Olsburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dotson v. Pounds
as 2:2024cv02053
Petitioner:
Jessie Dotson
Respondent:
Zac Pounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tims v. Shelby Co. Detention Center et al
as 2:2024cv02051
Plaintiff:
William Tims
Defendant:
Shelby Co. Detention Center, Sgt. Felts, Racardo Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webb v. Henderson County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv01024
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen Webb
Defendant:
Henderson County Jail, Jeffery Smith, Jackie Bausman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrd et al v. Bonner et al
as 2:2024cv02043
Plaintiff:
Laquita Byrd and Marcus Byrd
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Kirk Fields and Shelby County Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jones v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02038
Petitioner:
Jeremy David Jones
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Jones v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02039
Petitioner:
Jeremy David Jones
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Perkins v. State of Tennessee
as 1:2024cv01023
Petitioner:
Andre Perkins
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
