Cases 41 - 50 of 3,563
Brooks v. Gallagher et al
as 4:2024cv05028
Plaintiff:
Carl Alonzo Brooks
Defendant:
K Gallagher, Lisa Robtoy, Lori Ramsdellgilkey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randhawa v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv05027
Plaintiff:
Satnam S Randhawa
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections, Mark Phillip, Mark Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rojas-Rivera v. USA
as 2:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
Victor M Rojas-Rivera
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Reevis v. Eastern State Hospital
as 2:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Reevis
Defendant:
Eastern State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coley v. DOC Superintendent
as 2:2024cv00061
Petitioner:
Blayne Jeffrey Coley
Respondent:
DOC Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stevens v. Andrewjeski
as 4:2024cv05024
Petitioner:
Dakota Edward Stevens
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barragan Jr v. Andrewjeski
as 2:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
Francisco Barragan Jr
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Melton v. USPTO et al
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Kenneth David Melton
Defendant:
USPTO, LexisNexis and Google Chrome Extensions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Eastern State Hospital
as 2:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
William Edward Green
Respondent:
Eastern State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Murry v. Caughron et al
as 4:2024cv05019
Plaintiff:
Roy Howard Murry
Defendant:
Desaraye Caughron, Derek Anderson, Gabriel Lapsley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
