Cases 71 - 80 of 80,771
Curd v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Brandon Curd
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hickey v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03068
Plaintiff:
Michelle Lee Hickey
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Tatpa v. Jaddou et al
as 2:2023cv01751
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Schulz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05352
Plaintiff:
Laura Schulz
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
First Interstate Bank v Wall Street Apartments LLC
as 2:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
First Interstate Bank
Defendant:
Wall Street Apartments LLC
Interested Party:
Alaa Elkharwily
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Clissold v. Future Motion Inc
as 3:2024cv05355
Plaintiff:
Dylan Clissold
Defendant:
Future Motion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00650
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Fischer v. State of Washington Department of Corrections
as 3:2024cv05356
Plaintiff:
Jay Frank Fischer
Defendant:
State of Washington Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
van Kesteren v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
Andrea R. van Kesteren
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
