Cases 11 - 20 of 49
Cellular Communications Equipment LLC v. Apple Inc. et al
as 6:2014cv00031
Plaintiff:
Cellular Communications Equipment LLC
Defendant:
Apple Inc., AT&T Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Rembrandt Patent Innovations, LLC et al v. Apple Inc.
as 2:2014cv00015
Plaintiff:
Rembrandt Patent Innovations, LLC and Rembrandt Secure Computing, LP
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
ContentGuard Holdings, Inc. v. Amazon.com Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv01112
Plaintiff:
ContentGuard Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc. , Apple, Inc. , BlackBerry Corporation (f/k/a Research In Motion Corporation) and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
e-Watch Inc. et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 2:2013cv01061
Consolidated Defendant:
HTC Corporation, ZTE Solutions, Inc., BlackBerry Limited and others
Not Classified By Court:
Scott Woloson and Edward A Infante
Plaintiff:
e-WATCH CORPORATION and e-Watch Inc.
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
NYC IP, Inc. v. Apple Inc.
as 6:2013cv00921
Plaintiff:
NYC IP, Inc.
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Long Corner Consumer Electronics LLC v. Apple Inc.
as 2:2013cv01000
Counter Defendant:
Long Corner Consumer Electronics LLC
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
DSS Technology Management, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
as 6:2013cv00919
Plaintiff:
DSS Technology Management, Inc.
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Vantage Point Technology, Inc. v. Apple Inc.
as 2:2013cv00989
Plaintiff:
Vantage Point Technology, Inc.
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
eDekka LLC v. Apple Inc.
as 2:2013cv00969
Plaintiff:
eDekka LLC
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Adkins et al v. Apple Inc et al
as 3:2013cv00402
Plaintiff:
Patricia Sue Adkins , Jennifer Galindo and Fabrienne English
Defendant:
Apple Inc , Applecare Service Company Inc and Apple CSC Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.