District Court Cases in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 111,952
MAY v. SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
DAN J. MAY
Defendant:
SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and JAMES PEBBLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Jackson v. USA
as 1:2024cv00182
Petitioner:
Cornelius J Jackson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Durdan v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Company The
as 1:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Doug Durdan
Defendant:
Lincoln National Life Insurance Company The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
NEATHERY v. ALLEN
as 1:2024cv00770
Petitioner:
AUSTIN NOAH NEATHERY
Respondent:
TRENT ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KANABLE v. ALLEN et al
as 1:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
KRIS KANABLE
Defendant:
TRENT ALLEN, HIATT, D. THOMSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bure v. Gann et al
as 3:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Kevin James Bure
Defendant:
C Gann, Erin Williams, Smiley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin v. Jostes et al
as 3:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Ladarreon Austin
Defendant:
Jordan Jostes, B Wells and Liu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pruitt v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Keaton Pruitt
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Warfield v. Rankin
as 1:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Ieasha R Warfield
Defendant:
Shawn L Rankin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Waite v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Company The
as 1:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Lisa Waite
Defendant:
Lincoln National Life Insurance Company The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
