District Court Cases in Virginia
Cases 1 - 10 of 93,668
Gaffney v. i5 Services, LLC
as 1:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
Ruyi Gaffney
Defendant:
i5 Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00761
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Palmer v. Norfolk Sheriff et al
as 1:2024cv00746
Plaintiff:
James Dion Palmer
Defendant:
Norfolk Sheriff, Glenn Youngkin and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heather Stone Fund LLC et al v. Horsley
as 1:2024cv00731
Plaintiff:
Heather Stone Fund LLC, Summer Road Partners, LLC, Fall Street Management LLC and others
Defendant:
Samella Ramon Horsley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Ochar v. Apple Federal Credit Union
as 1:2024cv00757
Plaintiff:
Wilson Ochar
Defendant:
Apple Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Civil Rights (Race Discrimination)
Holmes v. Tocco et al
as 2:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Ebony Holmes
Defendant:
Vincent Tocco, Larry Chip Filer, Larry D. Boone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00759
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
