Cases 21 - 30 of 1,186,082
DONLEY v. GLOUCESTER CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2024cv06286
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JAMES DONLEY
Defendant:
GLOUCESTER CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, MAJOR CRIMES CAMDEN COUNTY and CAMDEN COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baldomor v. Wilkins et al
as 2:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Christopher Baldomor
Defendant:
FNU Wilkins, GCCF and Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoyt v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00498
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hoyt
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya and New Mexico Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Padilla v. Tafoya
as 1:2024cv00500
Plaintiff:
Joseph Padilla
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trujillo v. Wilkens et al
as 1:2024cv00501
Plaintiff:
Fabian Trujillo
Defendant:
FNU Wilkens, Jacob D. and Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olivas et al v. Wilkans et al
as 1:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
Obed Olivas, Daniel Strew, Aaron Reese and others
Defendant:
FNU Wilkans, I Jocobo and Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wopschall v. Wilkens et al
as 1:2024cv00503
Plaintiff:
Bobby Wopschall
Defendant:
FNU Wilkens, Jacob O. and Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McLaughin v. Livingston County PD et al
as 6:2024cv06314
Plaintiff:
Casey McLaughin, Sr.
Defendant:
Livingston County PD and L. Babeswski Laslo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hodge v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2024ct03129
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Hodge
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Cantu v. USA
as 3:2024cv01217
Petitioner:
Christopher Joe Cantu
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
