Rhode Island Civil Rights Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 2,000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Town of Charlestown et al
as 1:2023cv00338
Plaintiff:
Irving (Rocky) Johnson
Defendant:
Town of Charlestown, David Westervelt and Earl Stanton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Acosta v. Cross Road/Travel Aid Housing et al
as 1:2023cv00332
Plaintiff:
Robert Acosta
Defendant:
Cross Road/Travel Aid Housing and Rhode Island District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Dos Reis v. Officer Lara #129 et al
as 1:2023cv00322
Plaintiff:
Micael Duarte Dos Reis
Defendant:
Officer Lara #129, Officer Lane #109, Officer Leroux #424 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Minicucci
as 1:2023cv00315
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Smith
Defendant:
Steven Minicucci
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Educational Amendments
Logan et al v. Antaya et al
as 1:2023cv00293
Plaintiff:
Linda A. Logan and Ephraim E. Logan
Defendant:
Heather Antaya and Lynne Townsend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
