Rhode Island Civil Rights Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 1,995
Sarkisian v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00385
Plaintiff:
Melissa Sarkisian
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Parker v. Hutnak, et al.
as 1:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
David Parker
Defendant:
Noelle Clapham, Kimberly Hutnak, Phyllis Hutnak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker et al
as 1:2023cv00377
Petitioner:
David Parker
In Re:
RP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Educational Amendments
Parker v. Parker
as 1:2023cv00375
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Parker and Kimberly Hutnak
Defendant:
David Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Carr et al v. Barton Gilman LLP et al
as 1:2023cv00369
Plaintiff:
Daniel Carr and Core Healing Therapy
Defendant:
Barton Gilman LLP, All implicated therein, Rui Alves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hall et al v. South Kingstown Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv00359
Plaintiff:
Claire Hall and James Hall
Defendant:
South Kingstown Police Department, Police Chief Matthew C. Moynihan, Police Officer Matthew White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Benitez Caceres v. Bradley Hospital et al
as 1:2023cv00356
Plaintiff:
Mirca Benitez Caceres
Defendant:
Bradley Hospital, Rhode Island Hospital and Seven Hills Foundation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
