US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Cases 11 - 20 of 21,995
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Howard v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Pamela Howard
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bey et al v. City of Dothan, Alabama et al
as 1:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Noble Halona Bey, Latonya Dorsey and Mama T's, LLC
Defendant:
City of Dothan, Alabama, Stephanie Wingfield, Allison Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson et al v. SV Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Joseph Robinson and Jonathan Robinson
Defendant:
SV Group, Inc. and Renardo Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Russell v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Lee Russell, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Alabama and Tallapoosa County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Powell v. Railroad Retirement Board
as 3:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
David Powell
Defendant:
Railroad Retirement Board
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 231 Railroad Retirement Act of 1974
Donald v. Hamm et al
as 2:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Angela Donald
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, John Crow and Gwendolyn Babers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Mills v. Hamm et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Jamie Mills
Defendant:
John Hamm, Terry Raybon, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Ladarius Kintia Anderson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ross v. Guildford et al
as 2:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Rodney Patrick Ross
Defendant:
Jonathan Andrew Guildford, Stacie Irving and Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
