Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 11 - 20 of 22,748
Dennard v. United States of America (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00152
Plaintiff: Virgil Dennard
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00151
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poux v. Kimberly
as 1:2024cv00288
Plaintiff: Patrick Jerome Poux
Defendant: M Kimberly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pettway v. McClain et al
as 1:2024cv00075
Plaintiff: Mikel Dewayne Pettway
Defendant: Captain Antonio McClain and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Calloway (INMATE 3)
as 3:2024cv00153
Plaintiff: Silas Martin
Defendant: Rolanda Calloway
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2254 Civil Forfeiture
Martin v. Calloway (INMATE 1)
as 3:2024cv00148
Plaintiff: Silas Martin
Defendant: Rolanda Calloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Collins v. McClain et al
as 4:2024cv00281
Plaintiff: Tony Jerrod Collins
Defendant: Antonio McClain and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
George v. State Of Alabama
as 1:2024cv00067
Petitioner: George Boone, Jr.
Respondent: State Of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hornbuckle v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv08006
Petitioner: John Hornbuckle
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Martin v. Neely et al
as 7:2024cv00267
Petitioner: Candice Cherie Martin
Respondent: Kimberly Neely and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?