Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases

Death Penalty Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 176
Wimbley v. Raybon
as 1:2023cv00440
Smith v. Hamm et al (DEATH PENALTY) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00656
Plaintiff: Kenneth Eugene Smith
Defendant: John Q. Hamm and Terry Raybon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Raybon
as 2:2023cv01433
Petitioner: Bart Wayne Johnson
Respondent: Terry Raybon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Raybon
as 2:2023cv01332
Petitioner: Brandon Deon Mitchell
Respondent: Terry Raybon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peraita v. Hamm
as 1:2023cv00220
Petitioner: Cuhuatemoc Hinricky Peraita
Respondent: John Q. Hamm
Barber v. Ivey et al (DEATH PENALTY) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00342
Plaintiff: James Edward Barber
Defendant: Kay Ivey, John Q. Hamm, Terry Raybon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Hamm et al (DEATH PENALTY) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00506
Plaintiff: Alan Eugene Miller
Defendant: John Q. Hamm, Terry Raybon and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Hamm et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2022cv00505
Plaintiff: Westley Devone Harris
Defendant: John Q. Hamm and Terry Raybon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Hamm et al (DEATH PENALTY) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00497
Plaintiff: Kenneth Eugene Smith
Defendant: John Q. Hamm and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockhart v. Raybon
as 2:2022cv00368
Petitioner: Courtney Larrell Lockhart
Respondent: Warden Terry Raybon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?