US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 10,370
TAYLOR v. ROWE
as 3:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
DEVONTAI NATHANIEL TAYLOR
Defendant:
OFFICER BLAKE ROWE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUSSAW v. TALTON et al
as 5:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
ALBERT MARIO RUSSAW
Defendant:
CULLEN TALTON, ADA RODRIGO L SILVA, EDWARD D LUKEMIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00077
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
VAN NESS v. COUNTRYMAN et al
as 4:2024cv00031
Petitioner:
KEVIS VAN NESS
Respondent:
Sheriff GREGORY COUNTRYMAN and MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SNYDER v. SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS et al
as 5:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
ERIC EUGENE SNYDER, SR
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS, BORIUDIN, LIEUTENANT BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VAN NESS v. COUNTRYMAN et al
as 4:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
KEVIS VAN NESS
Defendant:
Sheriff GREGORY COUNTRYMAN, Lieutenant HARBERT, Sgt MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
TOLES v. NEWSOME et al
as 5:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
QUONTERIOUS TOLES
Defendant:
LT NEWSOME and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MOODY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOLES v. NEWSOME et al
as 7:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
QUONTERIOUS TOLES
Defendant:
LT NEWSOME and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MOODY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
