US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Cases 71 - 80 of 26,306
GLOBAL ONE FINANCIAL v. MODI et al
as 4:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
GLOBAL ONE FINANCIAL
Defendant:
TEJAS MODI, PINALI MODI, SADHANA D PATEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
LATIMORE v. JONES et al
as 3:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
AYAD S LATIMORE
Defendant:
MIKAL JONES, ASHLEY N CUELLAR, DAVID HARDGRAVE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HULING v. USA
as 4:2024cv00050
Petitioner:
CURTIS D HULING
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
SYMRISE INC v. SWEEGEN INC
as 4:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
SYMRISE INC
Defendant:
SWEEGEN INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SLOAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
CRAIG SLOAN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Other:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
SYMRISE INC v. Sweegen, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
SYMRISE INC
Defendant:
Sweegen, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
CARPENTER v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Jordan Carpenter and Jordan Carpenter on behalf of the Estate of Dennis Carpernter
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Danielle Rawl, Brittney Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
LEE v. ODOM
as 5:2024cv00111
Petitioner:
ROOSEVELT LEE, JR
Respondent:
ROY ODOM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
