Third Circuit Social Security Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 20,015
Bailey v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2024cv01562
Plaintiff:
Ms. Susan Bailey
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Heck v. O'MALLEY
as 5:2024cv01565
Plaintiff:
Ms. Melanie Heck
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bailey v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2024cv01568
Plaintiff:
Ms. Susan Bailey
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bender v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00654
Plaintiff:
Sherry Bender
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
HAM v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv05045
Plaintiff:
JOHN HAM
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
JONES v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv04942
Plaintiff:
BETTY JONES
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
LOCKWOOD v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv04957
Plaintiff:
KIM LOCKWOOD
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
GUADALUPE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv04982
Plaintiff:
SERGIO GUADALUPE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Schaefer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00649
Plaintiff:
Barbara A. Schaefer
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
HARTNER v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00561
Plaintiff:
Claire Olivia Hartner
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422 Appeal from Administrative Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
