US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 301
FREYLING v. CHRISTIAN FAITH PUBLISHING, INC.
as 1:2019cv00096
Plaintiff:
KAREN FREYLING
Defendant:
CHRISTIAN FAITH PUBLISHING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
FELICIANO v. GREAT LAKES ONLINE MEDIA, LLC
as 1:2019cv00075
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN FELICIANO
Defendant:
GREAT LAKES ONLINE MEDIA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
ITASCA IMAGES, LLC v. HORIZON SUPPLY COMPANY
as 2:2019cv00155
Defendant:
HORIZON SUPPLY COMPANY
Plaintiff:
ITASCA IMAGES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
FOUR QUARTERS INTERFAITH SANCTUARY OF EARTH RELIGION v. GILLE et al
as 3:2019cv00012
Defendant:
JOSHUA POWELL, WILLIAM VAN METER and KATE GILLE
Plaintiff:
FOUR QUARTERS INTERFAITH SANCTUARY OF EARTH RELIGION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALFORD-MORRIS DAY v. ROETHLISBERGER et al
as 2:2019cv00055
Defendant:
COLLEGE FOOTBALL NCAA, BEN ROETHLISBERGER, MIKE TOMLIN and others
Plaintiff:
RICKEY L. ALFORD-MORRIS DAY
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC v. LARKIN et al
as 2:2019cv00019
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC
Defendant:
JOHN LARKIN and DINERBARNS, INC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
ZUFFA, LLC v. ALSAKKA et al
as 2:2018cv01705
Defendant:
HOOKAH BOOKAH LLC and ALAMIR ALSAKKA
Plaintiff:
ZUFFA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
TELEO PT LLC v. FLINT TECHNOLOGIES SOLUTIONS LLC
as 2:2018cv01287
Defendant:
FLINT TECHNOLOGIES SOLUTIONS LLC
Plaintiff:
TELEO PT LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 2:2018cv01239
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 72.95.152.80
as 2:2018cv01266
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 72.95.152.80
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
