North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 151 - 160 of 30,586
Overcash v. USA
as 3:2024cv00476
Petitioner:
Timothy Alan Overcash
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Phillips v. USA
as 3:2024cv00478
Petitioner:
Arthiando Lurez Phillips
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
White v. Iredell County et al
as 5:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Jason Myers White
Defendant:
Iredell County, Vincent Pandolpha and Bert Connelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2024hc02096
Petitioner:
Daryl Williams
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, JESSICA SAGE and BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Macon v. Morton et al
as 5:2024ct03116
Plaintiff:
Cory Montae Macon
Defendant:
Warden Morton, Michael Russell, State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mebane v. Bullard et al
as 5:2024ct03122
Plaintiff:
Rashan A. Mebane
Defendant:
Jamie Bullard, Marc McPherson, Jason Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rouse v. Godfrey et al
as 5:2024ct03115
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lindell Rouse
Defendant:
John Godfrey, Marshall Pike, Cathy Judge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. Dexter et al
as 5:2024ct03117
Plaintiff:
Eugene A. Powell
Defendant:
Janet Dexter and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosby v. Bullard et al
as 5:2024ct03118
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mosby
Defendant:
Jamie Bullard, Marc McPherson, Jason Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grissom v. Bullard et al
as 5:2024ct03121
Plaintiff:
Darrick Grissom
Defendant:
Jamie Bullard, Marc McPherson, Jason Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
