North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 111 - 120 of 30,459
CRUMITIE v. USA
as 1:2024cv00360
Petitioner: THADDEUS THEOPALIS CRUMITIE
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
BALDWIN v. USA
as 1:2024cv00361
Petitioner: LA'REGINALD TREDARIUS BALDWIN
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
ELLIS v. GORDER
as 1:2024cv00371
Petitioner: KENNETH JERMAINE ELLIS
Respondent: R. VAN GORDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TURNER v. NAPHACARE CCS et al
as 1:2024cv00366
Plaintiff: JAMES JONATHAN TURNER
Defendant: NAPHACARE CCS, FORSYTH COUNTY JAIL and NURSE JERNEGEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCRAE v. RUSH et al
as 1:2024cv00368
Plaintiff: SAMUEL MCCRAE, III
Defendant: TAMARA RUSH, WARDEN PARSON, JERNIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPRAUVE v. UNKNOWN OFFICIALS AT DURHAM COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
as 1:2024cv00370
Plaintiff: JON C. SPRAUVE
Defendant: UNKNOWN OFFICIALS AT DURHAM COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Overcash v. USA
as 3:2024cv00421
Petitioner: Timothy Alan Overcash
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Cromartie v. Reams et al
as 5:2024ct03098
Plaintiff: Christopher D. Cromartie, Jr.
Defendant: Ashston Reams, Susan Addams, Marcus Houis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Pate et al
as 5:2024ct03099
Plaintiff: Daniel Isaiah Thomas
Defendant: Lt. Pate, Robeson County, Burnis Wilkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webb v. USA
as 5:2024cv00237
Petitioner: Lemont Jerrone Webb
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?